Calcady
Home / Trade / Welding / Arc Heat Input

Arc Heat Input

Calculate welding heat input (kJ/in) based on voltage, amperage, travel speed, and process efficiency factors for WPS compliance.

Calculate energy delivered per unit length (heat input) for code-compliant welding procedures (WPS).

Machine Parameters

HEAT INPUT: 30.00 kJ/in

Why Heat Input Matters

Heat input controls the cooling rate of the weld. Excessive heat can weaken the material (reducing toughness), while too little heat can cause Lack of Fusion.

Process Efficiency

Not all energy enters the metal. TIG loses a lot to heat radiation (0.6), while SAW (1.0) is nearly 100% efficient due to the flux blanket.

Travel Speed

Slower speeds increase heat input dramatically. Doubling your IPM cuts your total heat delivery in half.

Effective Heat Input

30.00 kJ/in
Including process efficiency losses
Raw Energy Density
37.50kJ/in

Joules per inch: 37500

Efficiency Applied80%

Thermal transfer rating

For estimation purposes only. Always consult a licensed professional before beginning work. Full Trade Safety Notice →

IPM Note

Travel speed (IPM) is the most difficult variable to control manually. Always use an average over a 6" test run for accurate WPS documentation.

Email LinkText/SMSWhatsApp

Quick Answer: What is welding heat input and why does it matter for WPS compliance?

Welding heat input (HI) quantifies the energy delivered to the base metal per unit length of weld: HI (kJ/in) = (V × A × 60 × η) ÷ (S × 1000), where V = arc voltage, A = current, S = travel speed (in/min), and η = thermal efficiency (process-specific). Heat input governs the cooling rate of the weld and heat-affected zone (HAZ) — the most critical metallurgical variable in structural welding. Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS) under ASME Section IX and AWS D1.1 typically specify maximum heat input limits to preserve HAZ toughness in quenched-and-tempered steels and pressure vessel materials. Exceeding these limits can cause grain coarsening, softening of Q&T zones, and brittle fracture risk in low-temperature service. Too low heat input increases risk of hydrogen-induced cold cracking (HICC) by accelerating cooling before hydrogen can diffuse out.

Thermal Efficiency Factors (η) by Welding Process

Process Abbrev. η (IEEE/AWS) Arc Type Notes
Submerged Arc Welding SAW 0.95 Buried / flux-covered Highest efficiency; arc is fully shielded by flux; nearly all electrical energy converts to heat in the joint
Shielded Metal Arc Welding SMAW 0.80 Open / coated electrode 20% loss to spatter, slag, and radiation; efficiency varies slightly by electrode type (E7018 vs. E6010)
Gas Metal Arc Welding (MIG) GMAW 0.80 Open / gas-shielded wire Short circuit mode slightly lower efficiency; spray transfer approaches 0.85 in some models
Flux Core Arc Welding FCAW 0.80–0.85 Open / flux-filled wire Gas-shielded FCAW (FCAW-G) toward 0.85; self-shielded FCAW-S closer to 0.80
Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (TIG) GTAW 0.60 Open / inert tungsten electrode Significant heat loss through tungsten and radiation to atmosphere; lowest efficiency of common arc processes
Plasma Arc Welding PAW 0.60–0.80 Constricted plasma column Varies significantly by plasma mode (transferred vs. non-transferred); keyhole mode approaches 0.80
Source: AWS A3.0/A3.0M and ASME Section IX Appendix A guidance. Use process-specific η from your WPS; if not specified, use the values above. Some WPS documents specify η = 1.0 (conservative, no efficiency reduction applied).

Heat Input Effects on Weld Quality — Metallurgical Impact Summary

Heat Input Level HAZ Effect Risk Typical Range (kJ/in)
Too Low Rapid quench — hard, brittle martensite formation Hydrogen-induced cold cracking (HICC) <15 kJ/in (material-dependent)
Low-Moderate Fine-grained HAZ; good toughness Optimal for most structural steels 15–35 kJ/in
WPS Optimum Controlled grain growth; balanced properties Code-compliant for most applications 25–55 kJ/in (varies by spec)
High Coarse grain HAZ; reduced Charpy impact toughness HAZ toughness loss; approaching WPS limits 55–90 kJ/in
Too High Severe grain coarsening; Q&T zone softening (intercritical HAZ) WPS violation; brittle fracture risk in low-temp service >90 kJ/in (ASME / AWS must specify)
Values are indicative for carbon and low-alloy steels (A36, A572, A516). Always reference your WPS, base metal P-number grouping (ASME), and applicable code (ASME Section IX, AWS D1.1, API 1104) for project-specific limits.

Pro Tips & Critical Heat Input Mistakes

Do This

  • Measure travel speed over the actual arc-on time — not total elapsed time. Travel speed for the heat input formula is arc-on travel speed: the distance traveled divided by the time the arc was actually burning. If a welder stops momentarily to reposition or clear a slag pocket, that pause time must be excluded. The correct method: mark start/stop points on the workpiece, time only the continuous arc travel, then calculate ipm = distance(in) ÷ arc-on time(min). A measured 9.5 ipm rounded to 10 ipm overstates speed by 5%, which understates heat input by ~5% — potentially taking a marginal weld below the WPS minimum.
  • Track interpass temperature alongside heat input — they are both controlled variables per ASME Section IX QW-406. Maximum interpass temperature (typically 400–600°F for most structural steels) limits the accumulated thermal cycle between passes. High heat input + high interpass temperature creates a compound effect: slow cumulative cooling rates that can degrade notch toughness beyond what either variable alone predicts. For Charpy V-notch (CVN) qualified welds (-40°F DBTT applications), verify that both heat input per pass and interpass temperature stay within PQR-tested limits — not just heat input alone.

Avoid This

  • Don't use η = 1.00 for GTAW calculations unless your WPS explicitly specifies it. Some engineers default to no efficiency factor to “be conservative” on the high side, but this creates a non-conservative error for GTAW: using η = 1.00 instead of 0.60 inflates calculated heat input by 67%, making the weld appear to meet a minimum heat input requirement when the actual energy deposited into the joint is well below the threshold. At GTAW: 20V × 180A × 60 ÷ (3 ipm × 1000) = 72 kJ/in apparent vs. 72 × 0.60 = 43.2 kJ/in actual. For HICC-sensitive alloys requiring minimum 40 kJ/in, using η = 1.00 would falsely pass a weld that is actually marginal.
  • Don't confuse heat input with net heat input or line energy — terms differ between codes. AWS D1.1 historically used “heat input” without an efficiency factor in its formula (H = (V×A×60) ÷ (S×1000)), effectively setting η = 1.00. ASME Section IX uses “heat input” with the efficiency factor applied. Some international standards (ISO 15614) use “arc energy” = V×A÷S and “heat input” = arc energy × η, with S in mm/s and result in J/mm. Always verify which formula definition your applicable code uses before comparing results — the same output number can mean fundamentally different things depending on the standard.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I verify heat input compliance with my WPS on the job site?

Standard field practice: (1) Record arc voltage and amperage from the machine display or use a calibrated clamp meter at the work cable (not the power supply display — cable drop causes discrepancy). (2) Time the welder over a known distance (scribe two marks 6–12 inches apart on the joint) with a stopwatch, arc-on only: travel speed = distance ÷ arc-on time. (3) Plug V, A, S, and η into the heat input formula and compare the result to your WPS minimum and maximum limits. For ASME Section IX welds, the PQR-qualified heat input limits are typically expressed as ±10–25% of the tested value per QW-409. Document all measurements in the weld traveler or weld data sheet — QC inspectors and AI/CWIs verify this against the WPS on final inspection.

What is the heat input limit for welding A516 Grade 70 pressure vessel steel?

ASTM A516 Gr. 70 (normalized or as-rolled) is a common pressure vessel plate steel with no specified maximum heat input in the base standard — the limit is established by your PQR (Procedure Qualification Record). However, widely used industry guidance (from published PQR data) places the practical upper limit around 65–90 kJ/in (SMAW/GMAW) for normalized material targeting good CVN toughness at service temperatures above −20°F. For low-temperature service (MDMT below −20°F per ASME Section VIII UCS-66), heat input must be kept to the PQR-tested range, and impact testing per QW-403.6 becomes mandatory. If your WPS was qualified at 40 kJ/in and you want to run at 70 kJ/in, you must re-qualify a new PQR at that heat input level and perform new Charpy impact testing on HAZ samples.

How does preheating interact with heat input calculations?

Preheat temperature is a separate controlled variable from heat input: it sets the starting temperature of the base metal before the arc is struck, which directly affects the cooling rate curve — higher preheat = slower cooling = less martensite and lower HICC risk. The heat input formula does not mathematically include preheat, but both variables are controlled in tandem in any code-compliant WPS. AWS D1.5 (bridge welding) and API 1104 (pipeline) specify minimum preheats by carbon equivalent (CE ≥ 0.40 commonly requires 200–300°F preheat). Using this calculator with a higher preheat scenario: if you raise preheat from 150 to 300°F, you may be permitted to reduce heat input (faster travel) while still staying above the HICC threshold — this can increase productivity without sacrificing metallurgical quality. The combined effect is captured by the Graville diagram and cooling rate curves, not the simple heat input formula alone.

Why does the same kJ/in produce different HAZ properties in different steel grades?

Heat input (kJ/in) is a measure of energy per unit length, but the resulting HAZ cooling rate also depends on: (1) Material thickness — thicker plate acts as a heat sink, accelerating cooling for the same heat input. A 1.5” plate with 40 kJ/in cools faster than a 0.25” plate at the same input (more conduction paths). (2) Steel carbon equivalent (CE) — higher CE means the martensite start temperature (Ms) is lower, making hardening more likely at the same cooling rate. ASTM A514 (high-strength Q&T, CE ~0.65+) requires vastly lower heat input than A36 (CE ~0.25) to preserve its 100 ksi yield strength — excessive heat completely destroys Q&T temper in the intercritical HAZ. (3) Thermal conductivity and diffusivity — stainless steel (316L) has ~1/3 the thermal conductivity of carbon steel, so the HAZ stays hot much longer at the same heat input, leading to carbide sensitization (chromium carbide precipitation) if the 800–1500°F sensitization range is traversed slowly. For stainless, the goal is low heat input to get through that range quickly.

Related Calculators